Shop

Ford Ranger – Mazda BT50 2.5 diesel engine

The Ford Ranger and Mazda BT-50 share some similarities in their engine options, particularly the diesel variants. The 2.5 diesel engine you’re referring to might be related to the engines used in these vehicles.

The Ford Ranger has used various diesel engines, including the 2.5 Duratorq TDCi in some models. The Mazda BT-50, on the other hand, has used engines like the MZR-CD 2.5 diesel.

If you’re looking for information on these engines, such as specs, reliability, or potential upgrades, feel free to ask. Alternatively, if you’re searching for parts or suppliers, I can help with that too. What specifically would you like to know about the Ford Ranger or Mazda BT-50’s 2.5 diesel engine?

The Ford Ranger has used various diesel engines, including the 2.5 Duratorq TDCi in some models. The Mazda BT-50, on the other hand, has used engines like the MZR-CD 2.5 diesel.

If you’re looking for information on these engines, such as specs, reliability, or potential upgrades, feel free to ask. Alternatively, if you’re searching for parts or suppliers, I can help with that too. What specifically would you like to know about the Ford Ranger or Mazda BT-50’s 2.5 diesel engine?

The Ford Ranger and Mazda BT-50 share some similarities, particularly in their diesel engine options. Here’s a comparison of the two vehicles:

Engine Comparison

• Ford Ranger 2.5 TDCi: 2.5L 4-cylinder turbo diesel engine, producing 143 horsepower at 3500 rpm and 330 Nm of torque.
• Mazda BT-50 2.5 MZR CD: 2.5L 4-cylinder turbo diesel engine, producing 143 horsepower and 329 Nm of torque.

Performance

• Ford Ranger 2.5 TDCi: Top speed of 158 km/h, acceleration from 0-100 km/h in 12.5 seconds.
• Mazda BT-50 2.5 MZR CD: Top speed of 158 km/h, acceleration from 0-100 km/h in 12.5 seconds.

Fuel Efficiency

• Ford Ranger 2.5 TDCi: Combined fuel consumption of 8.9 L/100 km.
• Mazda BT-50 2.5 MZR CD: Combined fuel consumption of 8.9 L/100 km.

Key Features

• Ford Ranger:
  • 4×4 transmission
  • 70-liter fuel tank
  • 245/70R16 tires
• Mazda BT-50:
  • 4×4 transmission
  • 70-liter fuel tank
  • 245/70R16 tires

Comparison of Different Model Years

• 2007 Ford Ranger 2.5 TDCi vs Mazda BT-50 2.5 MZR CD: Both vehicles have similar performance and fuel efficiency.
• 2008 Ford Ranger 2.5 TDCi vs Mazda BT-50 2.5 MZR CD: Similar performance and fuel efficiency.
• 2009 Ford Ranger 3.0 TDCi vs Mazda BT-50 2.5 MZR CD: Ford Ranger has a slightly higher top speed and more powerful engine.
• 2012 Ford Ranger 2.2 TDCi vs Mazda BT-50 2.5 MZR CD: Ford Ranger has a slightly higher top speed and more torque.
• 2016 Ford Ranger 2.2 TDCi vs Mazda BT-50 2.5 MZR CD: Ford Ranger has a higher top speed and more powerful engine.
• 2021 and 2022 Ford Ranger Raptor vs Mazda BT-50 2.5 MZR CD: Ford Ranger Raptor has a more powerful engine and higher top speed ¹ ² ³.